gipuzkoakultura.net

Logo de la Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa
Logotipo gipuzkoakultura

gipuzkoakultura.net

lunes 25 noviembre 2024





Bertan > Bertan 17 La época romana > Versión en inglés: Fishing and fish-processing

Printable PDF version [11,8 Mb]Ikono Acrobat

Fishing and fish-processing

142. One of the ingredients of fish sauce was mackerel.© Xabi Otero
142. One of the ingredients of fish sauce was mackerel.© Xabi Otero

Fishing played as important a part in the Roman economy as the production of cereal, wine and vegetable oil, with the population largely depending on it for their subsistence. Fresh or preserved, fish was served at practically every table in the empire; the wealthy sought out species they considered to be of high quality, but fish was also a staple diet of the poorer classes. Fish sauces were also common and are mentioned in the majority of contemporary recipes. At least four kinds of sauce are known - garum, hallec, muria y liquamen. Of these, garum was the most popular. It was obtained by allowing the entrails of the fish to ferment naturally, using salt as an antiseptic agent to prevent putrefaction. Many kinds of fish, from large species like tuna to smaller fish were used. A mixture of one part salt to eight parts fish was left to dry in the sun for several weeks and stirred daily. Finally, the paste it was strained repeatedly until a clear sauce was obtained which was then stored in amphorae for transport and sale.

143. Although salting factories were introduced to the Iberian peninsula by the Phoenicians, it was during the Roman era that they spread to all coastal areas, including the Atlantic, reaching the coast of Armorica and Brittania. The only salt supply centre that has been identified in Gipuzkoa from this period stood in the springs of Salinas de Léniz, although there were also important rock salt deposits near Bayonne.© Xabi Otero
143. Although salting factories were introduced to the Iberian peninsula by the Phoenicians, it was during the Roman era that they spread to all coastal areas, including the Atlantic, reaching the coast of Armorica and Brittania. The only salt supply centre that has been identified in Gipuzkoa from this period stood in the springs of Salinas de Léniz, although there were also important rock salt deposits near Bayonne.© Xabi Otero
145. Sign from a fish-hatchery in Asturias.
145. Sign from a fish-hatchery in Asturias.

To meet this demand, fish factories developed for salting fish and making fish sauces all along the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of Hispania, as well as the North African coast and the Atlantic coast of Gaul. Tuna was the most sought-after product, though smaller fish like sardines and mackerel were also processed. The factories were located close to the coast and a source of fresh water. They were made up of two basic spaces, one for cleaning and shredding the fish and the other containing the basins for macerating the produce with salt. For the factories to run smoothly there had to be both a supply of salt and a selective supply of fish.

144. Excavations at the factory in Ghetary have unearthed abundant remains of tuna.© Xabi Otero
144. Excavations at the factory in Ghetary have unearthed abundant remains of tuna.© Xabi Otero

The fish-processing plants on the Gipuzkoan coast shared these general features. One has been identified at Getaria, another at the Labourd port of Guethary, and it is very possible that between these two locations there were others, as yet undocumented. It seems likely that the names Getaria and Guethary are related to the Latin word cetaria, meaning a fish-processing plant. Some years ago a row of salting-basins was discovered at the railway station in Guethary and soon afterwards it was confirmed that Getaria in Gipuzkoa had also been occupied by the Romans. The first remains brought to light in 1997 was confined to the area around the parish church of San Salvador, but subsequent research has shown that Roman occupation extended throughout the old quarter of the town. The archaeological evidence has been backed by linguistic research by Joaquín Gorrochategui of the University of the Basque Country who proposes a common etymological root for Getaria and Guethary.

Hook and Line Fishing

146. Roman hooks consisted of four parts: the head, which was joined to the fishing line, the main shaft, the U-shaped hook and the tip or tongue, used to ensnare the fish.© Xabi Otero
146. Roman hooks consisted of four parts: the head, which was joined to the fishing line, the main shaft, the U-shaped hook and the tip or tongue, used to ensnare the fish.© Xabi Otero
150. Fish weirs as depicted by Moreno and Abad (1971).© Moreno eta  Abad ( 1971 ), Xabi Otero
150. Fish weirs as depicted by Moreno and Abad (1971).© Moreno eta Abad ( 1971 ), Xabi Otero

Rods were made of long, tough, flexible cane, and the line, of linen thread or horsehair. The hook was fixed on the end of the line, baited, and weighted with lead. Cork floats were used to signal a catch, as they are today. Deep-water fishing was also practised with a setline, with several baited hooks around a central stock. The hooks (hamus) were made of iron, bronze or copper, depending on the size of the fish to be caught. Their shape has scarcely changed over the ages, as may be seen from the collections recovered from archaeological excavations in Gipuzkoa.

Nets

147. There are various sites along the Gipuzkoan coast which would have been suitable for fish weirs. One of the most important of these is the tidal flats of Zumaia.© Xabi Otero
147. There are various sites along the Gipuzkoan coast which would have been suitable for fish weirs. One of the most important of these is the tidal flats of Zumaia.© Xabi Otero

Amongst the nets most commonly employed was the so-called iaculum or funda, a small, funnel-shaped net with lead weights which was cast into the water from a height; the drag-net called sagena, verriculum or tragula, and the hand-net or hypoche. All these methods are known to have been used in this area because tools have been discovered that were used for making and repairing the nets. Such is the case of the shuttle, an implement comprising a narrow rod forked at both ends which was used to gather up the nets. The shuttle was moved alternately to the left and right over the weft to braid the net. Large, long-bodied, flat-headed needles with a hole in the head have also been unearthed, which would have been used for repairing and sewing the nets. Net-weights, too, have been found, consisting of pebbles with grooves for tying string onto, whose function was to keep the net submerged.

148. Bone needles.© Xabi Otero
148. Bone needles.© Xabi Otero

Fish Traps

149. Nets spread out in the port of Getaria. Nets were sewn and repaired using long bone needles and bronze shuttles.© Xabi Otero
149. Nets spread out in the port of Getaria. Nets were sewn and repaired using long bone needles and bronze shuttles.© Xabi Otero

These wicker or esparto cages were employed mainly in rivers and estuaries. They were designed in such a way that fish lured inside by the bait were unable to swim out again.

Weirs and Crab Nets

154. Shuttle.© Xabi Otero
154. Shuttle.© Xabi Otero

Weirs are constructions built on tidal flats and strands to trap fish at low tide. They are usually rounded in shape and make use of natural features, especially depressions. In Gipuzkoa there are a number of places where this type of fishing is practicable, as in Zumaia. In Getaria too, before extension work was completed on the harbour, it was common to see fish trapped in pools left on the uneven sea-bed at low tide.

152. Shrimp net from Hondarribia; it was weighted down with lead staples.© Xabi Otero
152. Shrimp net from Hondarribia; it was weighted down with lead staples.© Xabi Otero
153. Lead weights from Oiasso.© Xabi Otero
153. Lead weights from Oiasso.© Xabi Otero

There is also some archaeological evidence to suggest that crab nets may have been employed in this area in Roman times. A number of strips of lead have been found which are identical to those used today for weighing down the nets used for catching shellfish.

151. Trap as depicted by Moreno and Abad (1971).© Moreno eta  Abad ( 1971 )
151. Trap as depicted by Moreno and Abad (1971).© Moreno eta Abad ( 1971 )
Licencia Creative Commons. Pulse aquí para leerla
2024 Departamento de Cultura y Euskera- Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa.
Para conectar con nosotros mediante skype pulse aquí
Logotipo Gipuzkoa.net. Pulsar para ir a la página de Gipuzkoa.net